AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Musk speech on ai transcript11/9/2023 Well, who is in control and what exactly is the relationship between OpenAI and Microsoft? And I do worry that Microsoft may be more in control than, say the leadership team at OpenAI realises. And in general, if it is legal to start a company as a non-profit, and then take the IP and transfer it to a for-profit, that then makes tonnes of money? Shouldn't everyone start? Shouldn't that be the default? And I also think that it’s important to understand that when push comes to shove, let's say they do create some digital super-intelligence, almost Godlike intelligence. And you would be therefore like, wait for a second - that is the exact opposite of what I gave them money for. Instead, they became a lumber company and chopped down the forest and sold it for money. I mean, this would be like, let's say you fund an organisation to save the Amazon rainforest. And we just we flip the tasks, Tesla would win.Ī: It does seem weird that something can be a non-profit, open source and somehow transform itself into a for-profit, closed source. And so, if the positions were reversed, and you said, okay, Tesla has got to produce a large language model that has output equal to or greater than ChatGPT or Microsoft, OpenAI has to do self-driving. Tesla basically has that, and it is far more advanced than Google. They have been trying that for a long time, they have been unsuccessful. Basically, Google is unable to produce a generalized solution to self-driving that works anywhere. But as soon as anything goes wrong with those streets like there is an accident or a parade or road construction, it stops working. For example, Google has Waymo, which is sort of attempting self-driving and they are able to make self-driving work in a very limited geography with very tightly mapped streets. And I would also say that if positions were reversed in fact, the positions are reversed. And then 5 million cars and then 10 million cars. Suddenly, 3 million cars will drive themselves with no one. I think Tesla will have sort of a ChatGPT moment, maybe if not this year, I would say no later than next year. But there are many other things for Twitter, it’s not just financial.Ī: I don't know. And so, it's possible to have a much more efficient, homogenous real-time data system money is just information and that is not the only reason, it’s just a thing that would be poetic to fulfill, ultimately, the vision that I had for X over 23 years ago and see that come to fruition would be nice. And here we can get quite esoteric in terms of information theory, but the actual financial system today is a heterogeneous set of databases running on mainframes and COBOL (Common Business Oriented Language) - that still engage in batch processing, it's very inefficient. And so, I think there is potential to create a more efficient financial system. And what people see in Paypal is sort of a halfway, frankly half-baked version of what it could be. I am like, if we are going to make a product that improves the quality of life for people that they find more useful, that is great. But I am not out for disruption for the sake of disruption. A: I don't want to disrupt something with the superb sake of disrupting it, it's more like, if there is a better product, that's great.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |